|
The Cost of Privacy?
The case of Campbell v Mirror (EC find out name)
attracted media attention not least because it
involved a supermodel and raised some interesting
issues regarding privacy. There is no tort of
privacy and cases which are litigated often involve
high profile parties who it is said, are the only
people who can afford to take such issues to trial.
The issue in this case was precisely this, the
defendants when faced with a huge bill from the
models solicitors argued that no-win-no-fee
arrangements infringed their free speech under Art
10 European Convention of Human Rights.
This was a clever and interesting argument, not
least because in the absence of a tort of privacy,
the UK courts have had to balance the issue of Data
Protection and the European Directive on the
protection of individuals with regard to the
processing of personal data and on the free movement
of such with the right to free speech. Some
commentators point to the difficulty that the courts
face when faced with a choice between the European
model which calls for a balance of competing values
and the American model which gives a premium to free
speech.
Free Speech
When faced with a £594,000 bill from Campbell’s
solicitors, the defendants argued that the £280,000
success fee charged by her instructing solicitors
infringed their free speech. The argument is well
founded, albeit perhaps not from such a successful
newspaper. If a smaller publication was faced with
the same bill then this could seriously threaten
their existence. There are many cases which have
been forced to settle out of court to avoid
precisely this.
The House of Lords observed that there was a
difference between the use of CFA’s in defamation
cases and personal injury cases. Liability insurers
can bear the risk of cases being lost whilst the
same cannot be said for small publishers.
The Daily Mirror can take some hope from the fact
that the bill presented by Campbells solicitors will
be subject to detailed assessment and as it seems
that the courts have adopted the European model,
they will surely observe the doctrine of
proportionality. Campbell recovered £3,500 in
damages whilst her solicitors fees were in excess of
£1 million.
|